NORTH RIDGE DAIRY Verra
VERRA
STAGE 01 · REGISTRY REVIEW

Verra

Available

Review program scope, project compatibility, internal requirements, and candidate methodologies before advancing North Ridge Dairy to methodology selection.

Voluntary Carbon Market International Methodology Review
All Registries
CARBON MARKET PATH

Follow the project in order

Registry → methodology → eligibility → verification → issuance.

REGISTRY DECISION

Program fit and next action

Show the information needed to decide whether this registry should remain in the project path.

PROGRAM PROFILE

Registry information

Methodology Review
PROGRAM TYPE Voluntary Carbon Market
GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE International
AVAILABLE Yes
SELECTED No
PROJECT POSITION

Internal review status

RECOMMENDED ACTION Ready for Methodology Review

Review applicable waste and methane methodologies.

READINESS 100.0%
REQUIREMENTS 7 / 7
BLOCKERS 0
CANDIDATE METHODS 1
INTERNAL SCREENING

Registry requirements

PASSED 7
REMAINING 0
BLOCKING 0
STATUS Ready for Methodology Review
Project Information Facility information complete

Facility code and facility name are available.

Pass
Environmental Accounting Carbon ledger available

60 carbon ledger records are available.

Pass
Environmental Accounting Positive credit volume estimated

14.041 estimated credits are available.

Pass
Monitoring Data quality meets threshold

Average data quality is 98.5%.

Pass
Accounting Status No draft ledger records

No draft accounting records remain.

Pass
Registry Readiness Eligible ledger records available

60 ledger records meet the current internal eligibility rules.

Pass
Registry Readiness Internal readiness gate passed

The facility passed the internal Registry Readiness assessment.

Pass
NEXT STAGE INPUT

Candidate methodologies

View Methodologies →
VERRA-METHANE-REVIEW
Candidate
Manure management and methane avoidance

Waste and Methane Avoidance Methodology Review

Review current Verra methodologies covering organic waste, manure treatment, methane destruction, baseline determination and monitoring requirements.

REVIEW STATUS Candidate
PROJECT CONTEXT

Current estimated exposure

These values are context for registry review, not issued credits or realized revenue.

ESTIMATED CREDITS 14.041 potential credits
ESTIMATED GROSS VALUE ¤252.75 before fees and verification costs
INTERNAL READINESS 100.0% current project readiness
STAGE 02 Continue to methodology review

The next decision is which methodology or protocol governs project eligibility, quantification, monitoring, and verification.

Methodologies →
i
Internal screening only

Registry acceptance and methodology applicability must be confirmed against current registry rules, protocol documents, and formal third-party review.